|
By Harry Welty According to the information coming out of JCI and the If you multiply $11 dollars, by 12 months and then multiply
that by 20 years you get $2,240 per household. If you assume that there are 2.5
people per household this would result in $896 in taxes for the average resident
of the But if you multiply this average individual tax burden by the 94,000 residents of the Duluth School District the resultant taxes over twenty years would yield only $84,224,000 a far cry from the $437 million it will take to finance the Red Plan.. If you simply divide the $437,000,000 figure by the District’s 94,000 residents you come up with a considerably higher per person tax over twenty years - $4,649. As some wag once said, “figures never lie, liar’s figure.” JCI has had a long history of working with school districts
on issues relating to air quality and construction. It advertises itself to
school districts as an expert in helping pass bond referenda. It must be very
annoying for JCI to put in lots of work with a District only to see a referendum
voted down. In fact, half of the There have certainly been many changes to state laws over
the years which permit small projects to be approved by the state rather than by
local voters. The question would be whether there have been enough changes to
justify letting a district other than Last spring JCI paid for a survey of It was so important that shortly after the survey was taken
it was announced that 71% of the people in It was so important that JCI placed the results from
Question 26 into its report for review and comment no less than four times.
It’s on the front page. It’s on an impressive graph on the next to last
page. It’s on pages 40 and 75. It tells the State Ed Dept. that How has JCI managed to make a $293 million building plan look so financially modest. At the first meeting of Let Duluth Vote one of the 34
citizens on the select committee came to our meeting and explained that the cost
of the Red Plan would only be $100 million dollars of bonding. We were confused
by this figure, at first until it occurred to us that while the cost of bonding
might only be $100 million the Red Plan would impose additional taxes for its
lease levy purchasing. While JCI may not have been responsible for this bit of
misinformation it dissemination didn’t speak well of the select committee that
one of its members had such a poor grasp of the costs For its part, JCI itself was just as bad. For one thing the
$9 to $11 dollar figure JCI used was based on a promise that it or the school
board could not keep. JCI said that as long as some of the Red Plan costs were
funneled into property tax relief the taxes would remain at this level. However,
if the property taxes were not plowed into property tax relief the taxes would
nearly double. This will almost certainly be the outcome in In part it’s because voters are being denied a right to
vote and will want to take their anger out on the School Board. Next year, after
they open their property tax statements, they will almost certainly vote against
an excess levy for operational expenses. This is all the more likely because the
current school board plans to double the existing excess levy. In the face of
this reality, future school boards are almost certain to make up for the loss of
There’s more. JCI has explained that it has based the
average tax costs on the “median” priced home in the And there’s this. (Page 79 of the Red Plan report for Comment and Review) To advertise the lowest possible tax for the Red Plan JCI back ended the taxes for the Red Plan. Next year’s Red Plan taxes will only be about one-third as much as they will be in its final year. The taxes increase at roughly 5.5 % per annum. JCI has made a very compelling case for the Red Plan. They
just haven’t made a very honest case. Even so they may have found enough
loopholes to shove the Red Plan down the throats of Duluth Voters. The people of
|
|